Grow it · ETFs

QYLD vs FANG

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing QYLD and FANG. FANG has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, FANG has the higher 3 years return at 33.9% a year, and QYLD offers the higher at 10.92%.
Lower fee
FANG 0.35% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
FANG 33.9% p.a.
Higher yield
QYLD 10.92%
Higher risk-adjusted
FANG Sharpe 1.3 (3y)
Lower volatility
QYLD 10.9% (3y)
Larger fund
FANG $1.8bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric QYLD
Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
FANG
Global X FANG+ ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
Global X
Tracks index
—
NYSE FANG+ Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic, Dividend, Tech, US
US, Tech, Growth, Thematic
Listed since
—
2020 (6 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$30m
$1.8bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.6%
0.35%
Dividend yield
10.92%
6.27%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
—
30%
Tax drag 3.49% 2.73%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
15.3%
net
12.6%
net
3-year return
12.1%
net
33.9%
net
5-year return
—
23%
net
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
10.9%
21.3%
Volatility (5y)
—
24.6%
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.73
1.3
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
0.84
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

QYLD Global X Nasdaq 100 Covered Call ETF
  • Top-19% returns over 1 year (59th of 318 ETFs we track).
  • High 10.92% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.48%.
FANG Global X FANG+ ETF
  • Top-2% returns over 5 years (4th of 189 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between QYLD vs FANG?

QYLD and FANG are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. FANG carries the lower management fee (0.35%). Over 3 years, FANG has delivered the higher total return (33.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - QYLD vs FANG?

FANG has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus QYLD 0.6%.

Which has performed higher - QYLD vs FANG?

Over the past 3 years, FANG has delivered the higher total return at 33.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

QYLD pays the higher at 10.92%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

FANG is the larger fund by assets ($1.8bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?