At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
QLTY
BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
|
WCMQ
WCM Quality Global Growth Fund - Active ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
BetaShares
|
—
|
| Tracks index |
iSTOXX MUTB Global ex-Australia Quality Leaders 150 Index
|
MSCI All Country World ex Australia Index
|
| Categories |
Intl, Factor, Quality
|
Intl, Growth, Quality, Active
|
| Listed since |
2018 (8 yrs)
|
2020 (6 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$992m
|
—
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.35%
|
1.35%
|
| Dividend yield |
3.41%
|
—
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
20%
|
20%
|
| Tax drag | 1.57% | 0.48% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
6.5%
net
|
—
|
| 3-year return |
13.3%
net
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
8.9%
net
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
10.9%
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
13%
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.84
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.48
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
QLTY and WCMQ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. QLTY carries the lower management fee (0.35%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
QLTY has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus WCMQ 1.35%.
QLTY pays the higher at 3.41%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
QLTY is the larger fund by assets ($992m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.