Grow it · ETFs

PCI vs MXT

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing PCI and MXT. MXT has the lower management fee at 0.7% a year.
Lower fee
MXT 0.7% p.a.

Side-by-side comparison

Metric PCI
Perpetual Credit Income Trust
MXT
Metrics Master Income Trust
Snapshot
Provider
Tracks index
RBA Cash Rate + 3.25%
RBA Cash Rate + 3.25%
Categories
AU
AU, Active
Listed since
2019 (7 yrs)
2017 (9 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
Cost & income
Management fee
0.88%
0.7%
Dividend yield
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
45%
15%
Tax drag 1.08% 0.36%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
3-year return
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

PCI Perpetual Credit Income Trust
  • A 0.88% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
MXT Metrics Master Income Trust
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.49%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between PCI vs MXT?

PCI and MXT are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MXT carries the lower management fee (0.7%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - PCI vs MXT?

MXT has the lower management fee at 0.7% a year, versus PCI 0.88%.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?