OZF vs MVB - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing OZF and MVB. MVB has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, MVB has the higher 10 years return at 11.4% a year, and MVB offers the higher at 4.27%.

Lower fee

MVB 0.28% p.a.

Higher 10 years return

MVB 11.4% p.a.

Higher yield

MVB 4.27%

Higher risk-adjusted

MVB Sharpe 0.55 (10y)

Lower volatility

OZF 17.8% (10y)

Larger fund

MVB $310m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	OZF State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex AREIT ETF	MVB VanEck Australian Banks ETF
Snapshot
Provider	State Street	VanEck
Tracks index	S&P/ASX 200 Financials Ex A-REIT Index	—
Categories	AU, Thematic	AU, Thematic
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$51m	$310m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.34%	0.28%
Dividend yield	2.78%	4.27%
Franking	90%	92%
Turnover	18%	15%
Tax drag	0.59%	0.58%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	8.4% net	16% net
3-year return	19.3% net	21.1% net
5-year return	13.4% net	14.6% net
10-year return	9.6% net	11.4% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	14.5%	15.4%
Volatility (5y)	16.8%	18.3%
Volatility (10y)	17.8%	19.4%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	1.02	1.06
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.64	0.67
Sharpe ratio (10y)	0.49	0.55
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

OZF State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex AREIT ETF

Top-12% returns over 5 years (22nd of 188 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.34% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: OZXX and MVB.

Full OZF analysis →

MVB VanEck Australian Banks ETF

Top-10% returns over 5 years (18th of 188 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.28% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: OZXX.

Full MVB analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between OZF vs MVB?

OZF and MVB are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MVB carries the lower management fee (0.28%). Over 10 years, MVB has delivered the higher total return (11.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - OZF vs MVB?

MVB has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, versus OZF 0.34%.

Which has performed higher - OZF vs MVB?

Over the past 10 years, MVB has delivered the higher total return at 11.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MVB pays the higher at 4.27%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MVB is the larger fund by assets ($310m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

OZF vs QFN OZF vs OZXX MVB vs QFN MVB vs OZXX

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.