Grow it · ETFs

MVB vs QFN

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing MVB and QFN. MVB has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, MVB has the higher 10 years return at 11.4% a year, and MVB offers the higher at 4.27%.
Lower fee
MVB 0.28% p.a.
Higher 10 years return
MVB 11.4% p.a.
Higher yield
MVB 4.27%
Higher risk-adjusted
MVB Sharpe 0.55 (10y)
Lower volatility
QFN 17.8% (10y)
Larger fund
MVB $310m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric MVB
VanEck Australian Banks ETF
QFN
BetaShares Financials Sector ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
BetaShares
Tracks index
S&P/ASX 200 Financials-x-A-REIT Index
Categories
AU, Thematic
AU, Thematic
Listed since
Fund size (AUM)
$310m
$111m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.28%
0.34%
Dividend yield
4.27%
2.04%
Franking
92%
90%
Turnover
15%
15%
Tax drag 0.58% 0.48%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
16%
net
8.7%
net
3-year return
21.1%
net
19.3%
net
5-year return
14.6%
net
13.4%
net
10-year return
11.4%
net
9.6%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
15.4%
14.4%
Volatility (5y)
18.3%
16.8%
Volatility (10y)
19.4%
17.8%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
1.06
1.02
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.67
0.64
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.55
0.48
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MVB VanEck Australian Banks ETF
  • Top-10% returns over 5 years (18th of 188 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.28% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: OZXX.
QFN BetaShares Financials Sector ETF
  • Top-12% returns over 3 years (27th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.34% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: OZXX and MVB.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MVB vs QFN?

MVB and QFN are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MVB carries the lower management fee (0.28%). Over 10 years, MVB has delivered the higher total return (11.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MVB vs QFN?

MVB has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, versus QFN 0.34%.

Which has performed higher - MVB vs QFN?

Over the past 10 years, MVB has delivered the higher total return at 11.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MVB pays the higher at 4.27%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MVB is the larger fund by assets ($310m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?