At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
NDQ
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
|
U100
BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
|
TECH
Global X Morningstar Global Technology ETF
|
IVV
iShares S&P 500 ETF
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||||
| Provider |
BetaShares
|
BetaShares
|
Global X
|
iShares
|
| Tracks index |
NASDAQ-100 Index
|
S&P 500 Equal Weight Index
|
Morningstar Developed Markets Technology Moat Focus Index
|
S&P 500 Index
|
| Categories |
US, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth, Market-Cap
|
US, Factor, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth
|
Intl, Thematic, Tech
|
US, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
|
| Listed since |
2015 (11 yrs)
|
2025 (1 yr)
|
2020 (6 yrs)
|
2007 (19 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$9.6bn
|
$99m
|
$332m
|
$14.3bn
|
| Cost & income | ||||
| Management fee |
0.48%
|
0.18%
|
0.45%
|
0.04%
|
| Dividend yield |
1.54%
|
12.37%
|
3.33%
|
1.05%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
15%
|
20%
|
30%
|
3%
|
| Tax drag | 0.85% | 4.44% | 1.79% | 0.41% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|||
| 1-year return |
11.7%
net
|
8.6%
net
|
10%
net
|
9.4%
net
|
| 3-year return |
20%
net
|
—
|
13.6%
net
|
17.4%
net
|
| 5-year return |
14.8%
net
|
—
|
8.8%
net
|
13.6%
net
|
| 10-year return |
20.9%
net
|
—
|
—
|
15.7%
net
|
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility (3y) |
16.2%
|
—
|
22.9%
|
11.4%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
18.3%
|
—
|
21.4%
|
12.5%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
15.9%
|
—
|
—
|
12%
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.96
|
—
|
0.49
|
1.11
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.68
|
—
|
0.35
|
0.84
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
1.14
|
—
|
—
|
1.1
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Top-2% returns over 10 years (2nd of 108 ETFs we track).
- Strong risk-adjusted returns (10-year Sharpe ratio 1.14).
- Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.4%.
- Low-cost: a 0.18% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- High 12.37% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: VTS, IVV, and IJH.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: FANG.
- Top-5% returns over 10 years (5th of 108 ETFs we track).
- Low-cost: a 0.04% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: VTS.
Frequently Asked Questions
NDQ, U100, TECH, and IVV are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IVV carries the lowest management fee (0.04%). Over 10 years, NDQ has delivered the highest total return (20.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
IVV has the lowest management fee at 0.04% a year, versus NDQ 0.48%, U100 0.18%, and TECH 0.45%.
Over the past 10 years, NDQ has delivered the highest total return at 20.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
U100 pays the highest at 12.37%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
IVV is the largest fund by assets ($14.3bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.