At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
NDQ
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
|
U100
BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
|
TECH
Global X Morningstar Global Technology ETF
|
IVV
iShares S&P 500 ETF
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||||
| Provider |
BetaShares
|
BetaShares
|
Global X
|
iShares
|
| Tracks index |
NASDAQ-100 Index
|
S&P 500 Equal Weight Index
|
Morningstar Developed Markets Technology Moat Focus Index
|
S&P 500 Index
|
| Categories |
US, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth, Market-Cap
|
US, Factor, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth
|
Intl, Thematic, Tech
|
US, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
|
| Listed since |
2015 (11 yrs)
|
2025 (1 yr)
|
2020 (6 yrs)
|
2007 (19 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$10.5bn
|
$104m
|
$346m
|
$14.9bn
|
| Cost & income | ||||
| Management fee |
0.48%
|
0.18%
|
0.45%
|
0.04%
|
| Dividend yield |
1.42%
|
12.01%
|
3.15%
|
1.25%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
15%
|
20%
|
30%
|
3%
|
| Tax drag | 0.81% | 4.32% | 1.73% | 0.47% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|||
| 1-year return |
17.5%
net
|
13.2%
net
|
18.7%
net
|
10.1%
net
|
| 3-year return |
24.4%
net
|
21.8%
net
|
17.7%
net
|
19.6%
net
|
| 5-year return |
16.7%
net
|
—
|
9.7%
net
|
14.4%
net
|
| 10-year return |
21.6%
net
|
—
|
—
|
16.2%
net
|
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility (3y) |
16%
|
18.2%
|
22.7%
|
10.9%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
18.1%
|
—
|
21.5%
|
12.3%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
16%
|
—
|
—
|
12%
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
1.2
|
0.96
|
0.65
|
1.33
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.77
|
—
|
0.38
|
0.89
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
1.17
|
—
|
—
|
1.13
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Top-2% returns over 10 years (2nd of 110 ETFs we track).
- Strong risk-adjusted returns (10-year Sharpe ratio 1.17).
- Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.4%.
- Top-12% returns over 3 years (28th of 236 ETFs we track).
- Low-cost: a 0.18% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: VTS, IVV, and IJH.
- Top-13% returns over 1 year (42nd of 318 ETFs we track).
- Cheaper alternatives exist: FANG.
- Top-5% returns over 10 years (5th of 110 ETFs we track).
- Low-cost: a 0.04% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: VTS.
Frequently Asked Questions
NDQ, U100, TECH, and IVV are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IVV carries the lowest management fee (0.04%). Over 10 years, NDQ has delivered the highest total return (21.6% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
IVV has the lowest management fee at 0.04% a year, versus NDQ 0.48%, U100 0.18%, and TECH 0.45%.
Over the past 10 years, NDQ has delivered the highest total return at 21.6% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
U100 pays the highest at 12.01%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
IVV is the largest fund by assets ($14.9bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.