At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
U100
BetaShares S&P 500 Equal Weight ETF
|
IJH
iShares S&P Mid-Cap ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
BetaShares
|
iShares
|
| Tracks index |
S&P 500 Equal Weight Index
|
S&P MidCap 400 Index
|
| Categories |
US, Factor, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth
|
US, Market-Cap
|
| Listed since |
2025 (1 yr)
|
2007 (19 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$99m
|
$495m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.18%
|
0.07%
|
| Dividend yield |
12.37%
|
1.2%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
20%
|
15%
|
| Tax drag | 4.44% | 0.74% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
8.6%
net
|
10.7%
net
|
| 3-year return |
—
|
11.1%
net
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
9.2%
net
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
11.5%
net
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
—
|
14.4%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
14.6%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
15.1%
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
—
|
0.52
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
0.46
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
0.66
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Low-cost: a 0.18% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- High 12.37% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: VTS, IVV, and IJH.
- Low-cost: a 0.07% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: VTS and IVV.
Frequently Asked Questions
U100 and IJH are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IJH carries the lower management fee (0.07%). Over 1 year, IJH has delivered the higher total return (10.7% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
IJH has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year, versus U100 0.18%.
Over the past 1 year, IJH has delivered the higher total return at 10.7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
U100 pays the higher at 12.37%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
IJH is the larger fund by assets ($495m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.