MVB vs OZF - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing MVB and OZF. MVB has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, MVB has the higher 10 years return at 10.5% a year, and MVB offers the higher at 4.42%.

Lower fee

MVB 0.28% p.a.

Higher 10 years return

MVB 10.5% p.a.

Higher yield

MVB 4.42%

Higher risk-adjusted

MVB Sharpe 0.5 (10y)

Lower volatility

OZF 17.9% (10y)

Larger fund

MVB $296m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	MVB VanEck Australian Banks ETF	OZF State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex AREIT ETF
Snapshot
Provider	VanEck	State Street
Tracks index	—	S&P/ASX 200 Financials Ex A-REIT Index
Categories	AU, Thematic	AU, Thematic
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$296m	$34m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.28%	0.34%
Dividend yield	4.42%	2.97%
Franking	92%	90%
Turnover	15%	18%
Tax drag	0.59%	0.6%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	2.9% net	-0.8% net
3-year return	19.8% net	17.7% net
5-year return	11.9% net	10.5% net
10-year return	10.5% net	9% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	15.8%	14.9%
Volatility (5y)	18.4%	17%
Volatility (10y)	19.5%	17.9%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.97	0.89
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.52	0.48
Sharpe ratio (10y)	0.5	0.45
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MVB VanEck Australian Banks ETF

Top-18% returns over 3 years (42nd of 236 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.28% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: OZXX.

Full MVB analysis →

OZF State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex AREIT ETF

Top-25% returns over 3 years (58th of 236 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.34% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: OZXX and MVB.

Full OZF analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MVB vs OZF?

MVB and OZF are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MVB carries the lower management fee (0.28%). Over 10 years, MVB has delivered the higher total return (10.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MVB vs OZF?

MVB has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, versus OZF 0.34%.

Which has performed higher - MVB vs OZF?

Over the past 10 years, MVB has delivered the higher total return at 10.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MVB pays the higher at 4.42%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MVB is the larger fund by assets ($296m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

MVB vs QFN MVB vs OZXX OZF vs QFN OZF vs OZXX

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.