MVB vs OZF - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing MVB and OZF. MVB has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, MVB has the higher 10 years return at 11.4% a year, and MVB offers the higher at 4.27%.

Lower fee

MVB 0.28% p.a.

Higher 10 years return

MVB 11.4% p.a.

Higher yield

MVB 4.27%

Higher risk-adjusted

MVB Sharpe 0.55 (10y)

Lower volatility

OZF 17.8% (10y)

Larger fund

MVB $310m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	MVB VanEck Australian Banks ETF	OZF State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex AREIT ETF
Snapshot
Provider	VanEck	State Street
Tracks index	—	S&P/ASX 200 Financials Ex A-REIT Index
Categories	AU, Thematic	AU, Thematic
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$310m	$51m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.28%	0.34%
Dividend yield	4.27%	2.78%
Franking	92%	90%
Turnover	15%	18%
Tax drag	0.58%	0.59%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	16% net	8.4% net
3-year return	21.1% net	19.3% net
5-year return	14.6% net	13.4% net
10-year return	11.4% net	9.6% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	15.4%	14.5%
Volatility (5y)	18.3%	16.8%
Volatility (10y)	19.4%	17.8%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	1.06	1.02
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.67	0.64
Sharpe ratio (10y)	0.55	0.49
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MVB VanEck Australian Banks ETF

Top-10% returns over 5 years (18th of 188 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.28% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: OZXX.

Full MVB analysis →

OZF State Street SPDR S&P/ASX 200 Financials ex AREIT ETF

Top-12% returns over 5 years (22nd of 188 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.34% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: OZXX and MVB.

Full OZF analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MVB vs OZF?

MVB and OZF are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MVB carries the lower management fee (0.28%). Over 10 years, MVB has delivered the higher total return (11.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MVB vs OZF?

MVB has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, versus OZF 0.34%.

Which has performed higher - MVB vs OZF?

Over the past 10 years, MVB has delivered the higher total return at 11.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MVB pays the higher at 4.27%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MVB is the larger fund by assets ($310m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

MVB vs QFN MVB vs OZXX OZF vs QFN OZF vs OZXX

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.