MQSD vs BSUB - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing MQSD and BSUB. MQSD has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, MQSD has the higher 1 year return at 6.2% a year, and MQSD offers the higher at 5.33%.

Lower fee

MQSD 0.29% p.a.

Higher 1 year return

MQSD 6.2% p.a.

Higher yield

MQSD 5.33%

Larger fund

MQSD $958m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	MQSD Macquarie Subordinated Debt Active ETF	BSUB BetaShares Australian Major Bank Subordinated Debt ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	BetaShares
Tracks index	—	Solactive Australian Major Bank Subordinated Debt Select Index
Categories	Bonds, AU, Active	AU
Listed since	—	2022 (4 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$958m	$772m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.29%	0.29%
Dividend yield	5.33%	4.69%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	30%	15%
Tax drag	2.43%	1.86%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	6.2% net	5.6% net
3-year return	—	—
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	—
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MQSD Macquarie Subordinated Debt Active ETF

Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 5.33% income yield.

Full MQSD analysis →

BSUB BetaShares Australian Major Bank Subordinated Debt ETF

Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 4.69% income yield.

Cheaper alternatives exist: OZBD and VACF.

Full BSUB analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MQSD vs BSUB?

MQSD and BSUB are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MQSD carries the lower management fee (0.29%). Over 1 year, MQSD has delivered the higher total return (6.2% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MQSD vs BSUB?

MQSD has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, versus BSUB 0.29%.

Which has performed higher - MQSD vs BSUB?

Over the past 1 year, MQSD has delivered the higher total return at 6.2% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MQSD pays the higher at 5.33%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MQSD is the larger fund by assets ($958m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

MQSD vs SUBD MQSD vs FSUB BSUB vs MXT BSUB vs PCI BSUB vs VACF BSUB vs OZBD BSUB vs SUBD BSUB vs BHYB

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.