Grow it · ETFs

BSUB vs MXT

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing BSUB and MXT. BSUB has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year and BSUB offers the higher at 4.83%.
Lower fee
BSUB 0.29% p.a.
Higher yield
BSUB 4.83%
Larger fund
BSUB $854m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric BSUB
BetaShares Australian Major Bank Subordinated Debt ETF
MXT
Metrics Master Income Trust
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
—
Tracks index
Solactive Australian Major Bank Subordinated Debt Select Index
RBA Cash Rate + 3.25%
Categories
AU
AU, Active
Listed since
2022 (4 yrs)
2017 (9 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$854m
—
Cost & income
Management fee
0.29%
0.7%
Dividend yield
4.83%
—
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
15%
15%
Tax drag 1.91% 0.36%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
5.1%
net
—
3-year return
—
—
5-year return
—
—
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
—
—
Volatility (5y)
—
—
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

BSUB BetaShares Australian Major Bank Subordinated Debt ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pays a useful 4.83% income yield.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: OZBD and VACF.
MXT Metrics Master Income Trust
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.49%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between BSUB vs MXT?

BSUB and MXT are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. BSUB carries the lower management fee (0.29%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - BSUB vs MXT?

BSUB has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, versus MXT 0.7%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

BSUB pays the higher at 4.83%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

BSUB is the larger fund by assets ($854m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?