MMKT vs MONY - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing MMKT and MONY. MONY has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year.

Lower fee

MONY 0.15% p.a.

Larger fund

MMKT $596m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	MMKT BetaShares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF	MONY VanEck Cash Plus Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider	BetaShares	VanEck
Tracks index	—	—
Categories	AU, Bonds, Active	AU, Bonds, Active
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$596m	$107m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.18%	0.15%
Dividend yield	—	—
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	0%	0%
Tax drag	0%	0%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	—	—
3-year return	—	—
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	—
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MMKT BetaShares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF

Low-cost: a 0.18% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: BILL, ISEC, and MONY.

Full MMKT analysis →

MONY VanEck Cash Plus Active ETF

Low-cost: a 0.15% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: BILL and ISEC.

Full MONY analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MMKT vs MONY?

MMKT and MONY are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MONY carries the lower management fee (0.15%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MMKT vs MONY?

MONY has the lower management fee at 0.15% a year, versus MMKT 0.18%.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MMKT is the larger fund by assets ($596m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

MMKT vs AAA MMKT vs BILL MMKT vs ISEC MMKT vs FSCF MONY vs AAA MONY vs BILL MONY vs ISEC

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.