MMKT vs BILL - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing MMKT and BILL. BILL has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year and BILL offers the higher at 3.96%.

Lower fee

BILL 0.07% p.a.

Higher yield

BILL 3.96%

Larger fund

BILL $1.2bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	MMKT BetaShares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF	BILL iShares Core Cash ETF
Snapshot
Provider	BetaShares	iShares
Tracks index	—	—
Categories	AU, Bonds, Active	AU, Bonds
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$596m	$1.2bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.18%	0.07%
Dividend yield	—	3.96%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	0%	0%
Tax drag	0%	1.27%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	—	4% net
3-year return	—	4.3% net
5-year return	—	3.3% net
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	0.1%
Volatility (5y)	—	0.5%
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	1.98
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MMKT BetaShares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF

Low-cost: a 0.18% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: BILL, ISEC, and MONY.

Full MMKT analysis →

BILL iShares Core Cash ETF

Low-cost: a 0.07% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 3.96% income yield.

Has lagged most peers over 3 years (186th of 226).

Full BILL analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MMKT vs BILL?

MMKT and BILL are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. BILL carries the lower management fee (0.07%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MMKT vs BILL?

BILL has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year, versus MMKT 0.18%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

BILL pays the higher at 3.96%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

BILL is the larger fund by assets ($1.2bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

MMKT vs AAA MMKT vs ISEC MMKT vs MONY MMKT vs FSCF BILL vs AAA BILL vs ISEC BILL vs MONY BILL vs FSCF

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.