At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
LPHD
Loftus Peak Global Disruption Hedged Active ETF
|
LPGD
Loftus Peak Global Disruption Active ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
—
|
—
|
| Tracks index |
—
|
—
|
| Categories |
Intl, Growth, Active
|
Intl, Growth, Active
|
| Listed since |
—
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$278m
|
$832m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
1.2%
|
1.2%
|
| Dividend yield |
6%
|
—
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
—
|
—
|
| Tax drag | 1.92% | — |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
18.9%
net
|
—
|
| 3-year return |
23%
net
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
19.9%
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.94
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Top-8% returns over 3 years (19th of 226 ETFs we track).
- High 6% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
- A 1.2% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
- A 1.2% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
Frequently Asked Questions
LPHD and LPGD are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. LPHD carries the lower management fee (1.2%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
LPHD has the lower management fee at 1.2% a year, versus LPGD 1.2%.
LPHD pays the higher at 6%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
LPGD is the larger fund by assets ($832m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.