Grow it · ETFs

IKO vs IAA

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing IKO and IAA. IAA has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, IKO has the higher 10 years return at 15.4% a year, and IKO offers the higher at 5.3%.
Lower fee
IAA 0.29% p.a.
Higher 10 years return
IKO 15.4% p.a.
Higher yield
IKO 5.3%
Higher risk-adjusted
IAA Sharpe 0.72 (10y)
Lower volatility
IAA 18% (10y)
Larger fund
IAA $1.8bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric IKO
iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
IAA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
Snapshot
Provider
iShares
iShares
Tracks index
—
MSCI AC Asia 50 Index
Categories
Asia
Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since
—
2007 (19 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$198m
$1.8bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.45%
0.29%
Dividend yield
5.3%
1.46%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
—
5%
Tax drag 1.7% 0.59%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
125.6%
net
48.7%
net
3-year return
45.9%
net
37.2%
net
5-year return
21.2%
net
16.3%
net
10-year return
15.4%
net
14.5%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
39.7%
20.3%
Volatility (5y)
34.2%
22.3%
Volatility (10y)
26.6%
18%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
1.04
1.47
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.63
0.64
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.58
0.72
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

IKO iShares MSCI South Korea ETF
  • Top-0% returns over 1 year (1st of 318 ETFs we track).
  • Pays a useful 5.3% income yield.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: IAA and VAE.
IAA iShares Asia 50 ETF
  • Top-3% returns over 3 years (7th of 236 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between IKO vs IAA?

IKO and IAA are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IAA carries the lower management fee (0.29%). Over 10 years, IKO has delivered the higher total return (15.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - IKO vs IAA?

IAA has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, versus IKO 0.45%.

Which has performed higher - IKO vs IAA?

Over the past 10 years, IKO has delivered the higher total return at 15.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

IKO pays the higher at 5.3%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IAA is the larger fund by assets ($1.8bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?