At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
IJP
iShares MSCI Japan ETF
|
J100
Global X Japan Topix 100 ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
iShares
|
Global X
|
| Tracks index |
MSCI Japan Index
|
TOPIX 100 Index
|
| Categories |
Intl, Asia, Market-Cap
|
Asia
|
| Listed since |
2007 (19 yrs)
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$1.6bn
|
$16m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.5%
|
0.4%
|
| Dividend yield |
5.13%
|
—
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
3%
|
—
|
| Tax drag | 1.71% | — |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
21.3%
net
|
—
|
| 3-year return |
15.3%
net
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
10.2%
net
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
9.5%
net
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
11.5%
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
12%
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
11%
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.94
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.61
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
0.69
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
IJP and J100 are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. J100 carries the lower management fee (0.4%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
J100 has the lower management fee at 0.4% a year, versus IJP 0.5%.
IJP pays the higher at 5.13%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
IJP is the larger fund by assets ($1.6bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.