Grow it · ETFs

J100 vs HJPN

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing J100 and HJPN. J100 has the lower management fee at 0.4% a year and HJPN offers the higher at 6.32%.
Lower fee
J100 0.4% p.a.
Higher yield
HJPN 6.32%
Larger fund
HJPN $355m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric J100
Global X Japan Topix 100 ETF
HJPN
BetaShares Japan Currency Hedged ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
BetaShares
Tracks index
TOPIX 100 Index
S&P Japan Exporters Hedged AUD Index
Categories
Asia
Asia
Listed since
—
—
Fund size (AUM)
$14m
$355m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.4%
0.56%
Dividend yield
—
6.32%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
—
—
Tax drag — 2.02%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
—
43.4%
net
3-year return
—
28.4%
net
5-year return
—
19.8%
net
10-year return
—
15.9%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
—
16.5%
Volatility (5y)
—
16.4%
Volatility (10y)
—
16.3%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
1.36
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
0.99
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
0.86
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

J100 Global X Japan Topix 100 ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.4% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
HJPN BetaShares Japan Currency Hedged ETF
  • Top-3% returns over 1 year (11th of 318 ETFs we track).
  • High 6.32% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: J100 and IJP.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between J100 vs HJPN?

J100 and HJPN are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. J100 carries the lower management fee (0.4%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - J100 vs HJPN?

J100 has the lower management fee at 0.4% a year, versus HJPN 0.56%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

HJPN pays the higher at 6.32%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

HJPN is the larger fund by assets ($355m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?