HGBL vs WXHG - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing HGBL and WXHG. WXHG has the lower management fee at 0.1% a year, HGBL has the higher 3 years return at 17.9% a year, and WXHG offers the higher at 7.11%.

Lower fee

WXHG 0.1% p.a.

Higher 3 years return

HGBL 17.9% p.a.

Higher yield

WXHG 7.11%

Higher risk-adjusted

HGBL Sharpe 1.15 (3y)

Lower volatility

WXHG 11.3% (3y)

Larger fund

HGBL $2.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	HGBL BetaShares Global Shares Currency Hedged ETF	WXHG State Street SPDR S&P World ex Australia Carbon Aware (Hedged) ETF
Snapshot
Provider	BetaShares	State Street
Tracks index	Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index (AUD Hedged)	—
Categories	Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap	Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap, ESG
Listed since	2021 (5 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	$2.7bn	$398m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.11%	0.1%
Dividend yield	1.23%	7.11%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	5%	—
Tax drag	0.51%	2.28%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	20.6% net	17.9% net
3-year return	17.9% net	16.9% net
5-year return	—	10.2% net
10-year return	—	11.9% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	11.4%	11.3%
Volatility (5y)	—	14%
Volatility (10y)	—	13.9%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	1.15	1.08
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	0.54
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	0.73
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

HGBL BetaShares Global Shares Currency Hedged ETF

Top-15% returns over 1 year (45th of 308 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.11% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: BGBL.

Full HGBL analysis →

WXHG State Street SPDR S&P World ex Australia Carbon Aware (Hedged) ETF

Top-20% returns over 1 year (62nd of 308 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.1% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.

Full WXHG analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between HGBL vs WXHG?

HGBL and WXHG are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. WXHG carries the lower management fee (0.1%). Over 3 years, HGBL has delivered the higher total return (17.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - HGBL vs WXHG?

WXHG has the lower management fee at 0.1% a year, versus HGBL 0.11%.

Which has performed higher - HGBL vs WXHG?

Over the past 3 years, HGBL has delivered the higher total return at 17.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

WXHG pays the higher at 7.11%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

HGBL is the larger fund by assets ($2.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

HGBL vs VGAD HGBL vs QHAL HGBL vs BGBL HGBL vs VGS HGBL vs GHRP HGBL vs IHOO HGBL vs IHWL WXHG vs VGAD

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.