HGBL vs IHWL - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing HGBL and IHWL. HGBL has the lower management fee at 0.11% a year, HGBL has the higher 3 years return at 20.9% a year, and IHWL offers the higher at 5.54%.

Lower fee

HGBL 0.11% p.a.

Higher 3 years return

HGBL 20.9% p.a.

Higher yield

IHWL 5.54%

Higher risk-adjusted

HGBL Sharpe 1.43 (3y)

Lower volatility

HGBL 10.9% (3y)

Larger fund

HGBL $2.9bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	HGBL BetaShares Global Shares Currency Hedged ETF	IHWL iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF
Snapshot
Provider	BetaShares	iShares
Tracks index	Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index (AUD Hedged)	—
Categories	Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap	Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap, ESG
Listed since	2021 (5 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	$2.9bn	$1.1bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.11%	0.15%
Dividend yield	1.21%	5.54%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	5%	—
Tax drag	0.51%	1.77%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	16.6% net	16.4% net
3-year return	20.9% net	20.5% net
5-year return	—	11.8% net
10-year return	—	12.6% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	10.9%	12.1%
Volatility (5y)	—	15.1%
Volatility (10y)	—	14.7%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	1.43	1.27
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	0.59
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	0.73
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

HGBL BetaShares Global Shares Currency Hedged ETF

Top-15% returns over 3 years (36th of 236 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.11% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: BGBL.

Full HGBL analysis →

IHWL iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF

Top-16% returns over 3 years (38th of 236 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.15% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: BGBL, WXHG, and HGBL.

Full IHWL analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between HGBL vs IHWL?

HGBL and IHWL are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. HGBL carries the lower management fee (0.11%). Over 3 years, HGBL has delivered the higher total return (20.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - HGBL vs IHWL?

HGBL has the lower management fee at 0.11% a year, versus IHWL 0.15%.

Which has performed higher - HGBL vs IHWL?

Over the past 3 years, HGBL has delivered the higher total return at 20.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

IHWL pays the higher at 5.54%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

HGBL is the larger fund by assets ($2.9bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

HGBL vs VGAD HGBL vs QHAL HGBL vs BGBL HGBL vs VGS HGBL vs GHRP HGBL vs IHOO IHWL vs VGAD IHWL vs BGBL

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.