Grow it · ETFs

IHWL vs BGBL

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing IHWL and BGBL. BGBL has the lower management fee at 0.08% a year, IHWL has the higher 3 years return at 17.6% a year, and IHWL offers the higher at 5.65%.
Lower fee
BGBL 0.08% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
IHWL 17.6% p.a.
Higher yield
IHWL 5.65%
Higher risk-adjusted
BGBL Sharpe 1.23 (3y)
Lower volatility
BGBL 9.9% (3y)
Larger fund
BGBL $4.7bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric IHWL
iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF
BGBL
BetaShares Global Shares ETF
Snapshot
Provider
iShares
BetaShares
Tracks index
Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
Categories
Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap, ESG
Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since
2021 (5 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$1bn
$4.7bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.15%
0.08%
Dividend yield
5.65%
1.17%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
5%
Tax drag 1.81% 0.49%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
19.8%
net
10.7%
net
3-year return
17.6%
net
16.9%
net
5-year return
11.2%
net
10-year return
12.5%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
12.5%
9.9%
Volatility (5y)
15.3%
Volatility (10y)
14.7%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
1.04
1.23
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.56
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.73
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

IHWL iShares Core MSCI World ex Australia ESG (AUD Hedged) ETF
  • Top-16% returns over 1 year (49th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.15% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: BGBL, WXHG, and HGBL.
BGBL BetaShares Global Shares ETF
  • Top-20% returns over 3 years (45th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.08% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between IHWL vs BGBL?

IHWL and BGBL are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. BGBL carries the lower management fee (0.08%). Over 3 years, IHWL has delivered the higher total return (17.6% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - IHWL vs BGBL?

BGBL has the lower management fee at 0.08% a year, versus IHWL 0.15%.

Which has performed higher - IHWL vs BGBL?

Over the past 3 years, IHWL has delivered the higher total return at 17.6% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

IHWL pays the higher at 5.65%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

BGBL is the larger fund by assets ($4.7bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?