Grow it · ETFs

GLOB vs NNWH

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing GLOB and NNWH. GLOB has the lower management fee at 0.98% a year and NNWH offers the higher at 17.64%.
Lower fee
GLOB 0.98% p.a.
Higher yield
NNWH 17.64%
Larger fund
NNWH $151m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric GLOB
Barrow Hanley Global Share Active ETF
NNWH
Nanuk New World Fund (Currency Hedged) Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Tracks index
MSCI World ex Australia Index
Categories
Intl, Value, Active
Intl, Active
Listed since
2022 (4 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$151m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.98%
1.1%
Dividend yield
17.64%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
30%
Tax drag 0.72% 5.64%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
29.2%
net
3-year return
20.6%
net
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
16.7%
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.97
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GLOB Barrow Hanley Global Share Active ETF
  • A 0.98% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
NNWH Nanuk New World Fund (Currency Hedged) Active ETF
  • Top-9% returns over 1 year (27th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • High 17.64% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • A 1.1% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GLOB vs NNWH?

GLOB and NNWH are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GLOB carries the lower management fee (0.98%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GLOB vs NNWH?

GLOB has the lower management fee at 0.98% a year, versus NNWH 1.1%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

NNWH pays the higher at 17.64%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

NNWH is the larger fund by assets ($151m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?