Grow it · ETFs

NNWH vs VGS

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing NNWH and VGS. VGS has the lower management fee at 0.18% a year, NNWH has the higher 3 years return at 25.7% a year, and NNWH offers the higher at 16.81%.
Lower fee
VGS 0.18% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
NNWH 25.7% p.a.
Higher yield
NNWH 16.81%
Higher risk-adjusted
VGS Sharpe 1.43 (3y)
Lower volatility
VGS 9.4% (3y)
Larger fund
VGS $52.5bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric NNWH
Nanuk New World Fund (Currency Hedged) Active ETF
VGS
Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF
Snapshot
Provider
—
Vanguard
Tracks index
—
MSCI World ex Australia Index
Categories
Intl, Active
Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since
—
2014 (12 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$151m
$52.5bn
Cost & income
Management fee
1.1%
0.18%
Dividend yield
16.81%
1.25%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
—
3%
Tax drag 5.38% 0.47%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
30.5%
net
9.9%
net
3-year return
25.7%
net
18.6%
net
5-year return
—
12.9%
net
10-year return
—
14.1%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
16.3%
9.4%
Volatility (5y)
—
10.9%
Volatility (10y)
—
10.8%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
1.24
1.43
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
0.87
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
1.07
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

NNWH Nanuk New World Fund (Currency Hedged) Active ETF
  • Top-6% returns over 1 year (20th of 318 ETFs we track).
  • High 16.81% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • A 1.1% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
VGS Vanguard MSCI Index International Shares ETF
  • Top-15% returns over 5 years (29th of 189 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.18% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: BGBL and IWLD.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between NNWH vs VGS?

NNWH and VGS are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. VGS carries the lower management fee (0.18%). Over 3 years, NNWH has delivered the higher total return (25.7% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - NNWH vs VGS?

VGS has the lower management fee at 0.18% a year, versus NNWH 1.1%.

Which has performed higher - NNWH vs VGS?

Over the past 3 years, NNWH has delivered the higher total return at 25.7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

NNWH pays the higher at 16.81%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

VGS is the larger fund by assets ($52.5bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?