Grow it · ETFs

GAME vs RBTZ

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing GAME and RBTZ. GAME has the lower management fee at 0.57% a year, GAME has the higher 3 years return at 14.4% a year, and GAME offers the higher at 2.56%.
Lower fee
GAME 0.57% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
GAME 14.4% p.a.
Higher yield
GAME 2.56%
Higher risk-adjusted
GAME Sharpe 0.58 (3y)
Lower volatility
GAME 19.1% (3y)
Larger fund
RBTZ $299m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric GAME
BetaShares Video Games and Esports ETF
RBTZ
BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
BetaShares
Tracks index
Nasdaq CTA Global Video Games & Esports Index
INDXX Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic, Tech
Intl, Thematic, Tech
Listed since
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$28m
$299m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.57%
0.57%
Dividend yield
2.56%
0.05%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
35%
Tax drag 0.82% 0.86%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-21.2%
net
-2.3%
net
3-year return
14.4%
net
5.7%
net
5-year return
2.2%
net
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
19.1%
20.6%
Volatility (5y)
22.6%
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.58
0.17
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.13
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

GAME BetaShares Video Games and Esports ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (300th of 308).
RBTZ BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (270th of 308).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between GAME vs RBTZ?

GAME and RBTZ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. GAME carries the lower management fee (0.57%). Over 3 years, GAME has delivered the higher total return (14.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - GAME vs RBTZ?

GAME has the lower management fee at 0.57% a year, versus RBTZ 0.57%.

Which has performed higher - GAME vs RBTZ?

Over the past 3 years, GAME has delivered the higher total return at 14.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GAME pays the higher at 2.56%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

RBTZ is the larger fund by assets ($299m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?