Grow it · ETFs

RBTZ vs ESPO

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing RBTZ and ESPO. ESPO has the lower management fee at 0.55% a year, ESPO has the higher 5 years return at 10.7% a year, and ESPO offers the higher at 13.48%.
Lower fee
ESPO 0.55% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
ESPO 10.7% p.a.
Higher yield
ESPO 13.48%
Higher risk-adjusted
ESPO Sharpe 0.46 (5y)
Lower volatility
ESPO 19.4% (5y)
Larger fund
RBTZ $299m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric RBTZ
BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and Esports ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
VanEck
Tracks index
INDXX Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index
MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index (AUD)
Categories
Intl, Thematic, Tech
Intl, Thematic, Tech
Listed since
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$299m
$73m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.57%
0.55%
Dividend yield
0.05%
13.48%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
35%
Tax drag 0.86% 4.31%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-2.3%
net
-17.9%
net
3-year return
5.7%
net
16.9%
net
5-year return
2.2%
net
10.7%
net
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
20.6%
17.4%
Volatility (5y)
22.6%
19.4%
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.17
0.76
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.13
0.46
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

RBTZ BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (270th of 308).
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and Esports ETF
  • Top-20% returns over 3 years (46th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • High 13.48% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (298th of 308).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between RBTZ vs ESPO?

RBTZ and ESPO are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. ESPO carries the lower management fee (0.55%). Over 5 years, ESPO has delivered the higher total return (10.7% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - RBTZ vs ESPO?

ESPO has the lower management fee at 0.55% a year, versus RBTZ 0.57%.

Which has performed higher - RBTZ vs ESPO?

Over the past 5 years, ESPO has delivered the higher total return at 10.7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

ESPO pays the higher at 13.48%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

RBTZ is the larger fund by assets ($299m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?