Grow it · ETFs

RBTZ vs ESPO

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing RBTZ and ESPO. ESPO has the lower management fee at 0.55% a year, ESPO has the higher 5 years return at 11.9% a year, and ESPO offers the higher at 13.02%.
Lower fee
ESPO 0.55% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
ESPO 11.9% p.a.
Higher yield
ESPO 13.02%
Higher risk-adjusted
ESPO Sharpe 0.51 (5y)
Lower volatility
ESPO 19.2% (5y)
Larger fund
RBTZ $296m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric RBTZ
BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF
ESPO
VanEck Video Gaming and Esports ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
VanEck
Tracks index
INDXX Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index
MVIS Global Video Gaming and eSports Index (AUD)
Categories
Intl, Thematic, Tech
Intl, Thematic, Tech
Listed since
2018 (8 yrs)
—
Fund size (AUM)
$296m
$74m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.57%
0.55%
Dividend yield
0.05%
13.02%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
35%
—
Tax drag 0.86% 4.17%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-4.9%
net
-23.1%
net
3-year return
10%
net
21.7%
net
5-year return
0.2%
net
11.9%
net
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
19.9%
16.7%
Volatility (5y)
22.3%
19.2%
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.37
1.02
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.13
0.51
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

RBTZ BetaShares Global Robotics and Artificial Intelligence ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (274th of 318).
ESPO VanEck Video Gaming and Esports ETF
  • Top-12% returns over 3 years (29th of 236 ETFs we track).
  • High 13.02% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (312th of 318).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between RBTZ vs ESPO?

RBTZ and ESPO are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. ESPO carries the lower management fee (0.55%). Over 5 years, ESPO has delivered the higher total return (11.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - RBTZ vs ESPO?

ESPO has the lower management fee at 0.55% a year, versus RBTZ 0.57%.

Which has performed higher - RBTZ vs ESPO?

Over the past 5 years, ESPO has delivered the higher total return at 11.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

ESPO pays the higher at 13.02%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

RBTZ is the larger fund by assets ($296m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?