Grow it · ETFs

FASI vs IAA

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing FASI and IAA. IAA has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, IAA has the higher 1 year return at 48.7% a year, and FASI offers the higher at 6.96%.
Lower fee
IAA 0.29% p.a.
Higher 1 year return
IAA 48.7% p.a.
Higher yield
FASI 6.96%
Larger fund
IAA $1.8bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric FASI
Fidelity Asia Active ETF
IAA
iShares Asia 50 ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Fidelity
iShares
Tracks index
—
MSCI AC Asia 50 Index
Categories
Asia, Active
Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since
—
2007 (19 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$31m
$1.8bn
Cost & income
Management fee
1.15%
0.29%
Dividend yield
6.96%
1.46%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
—
5%
Tax drag 2.23% 0.59%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-3.7%
net
48.7%
net
3-year return
—
37.2%
net
5-year return
—
16.3%
net
10-year return
—
14.5%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
—
20.3%
Volatility (5y)
—
22.3%
Volatility (10y)
—
18%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
1.47
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
0.64
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
0.72
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

FASI Fidelity Asia Active ETF
  • High 6.96% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • A 1.15% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.
IAA iShares Asia 50 ETF
  • Top-3% returns over 3 years (7th of 236 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between FASI vs IAA?

FASI and IAA are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IAA carries the lower management fee (0.29%). Over 1 year, IAA has delivered the higher total return (48.7% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - FASI vs IAA?

IAA has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, versus FASI 1.15%.

Which has performed higher - FASI vs IAA?

Over the past 1 year, IAA has delivered the higher total return at 48.7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

FASI pays the higher at 6.96%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

IAA is the larger fund by assets ($1.8bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?