At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
EMKT
VanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF
|
IZZ
iShares China Large-Cap ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
VanEck
|
iShares
|
| Tracks index |
MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index
|
FTSE China 50 Index
|
| Categories |
EM, Factor
|
EM, Asia, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
|
| Listed since |
2018 (8 yrs)
|
2007 (19 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$842m
|
$454m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.69%
|
0.6%
|
| Dividend yield |
12.84%
|
1.89%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
30%
|
25%
|
| Tax drag | 4.83% | 1.2% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
40.9%
net
|
-19.6%
net
|
| 3-year return |
27.1%
net
|
8.8%
net
|
| 5-year return |
16.3%
net
|
0.4%
net
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
2.3%
net
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
16.6%
|
21.8%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
15.1%
|
27.1%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
21.4%
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
1.29
|
0.3
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.87
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
0.1
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Top-4% returns over 1 year (14th of 318 ETFs we track).
- High 12.84% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
- Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.39%.
- Has lagged most peers over 1 year (308th of 318).
Frequently Asked Questions
EMKT and IZZ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IZZ carries the lower management fee (0.6%). Over 5 years, EMKT has delivered the higher total return (16.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
IZZ has the lower management fee at 0.6% a year, versus EMKT 0.69%.
Over the past 5 years, EMKT has delivered the higher total return at 16.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
EMKT pays the higher at 12.84%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
EMKT is the larger fund by assets ($842m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.