EMKT vs B1SM - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing EMKT and B1SM. EMKT has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, EMKT has the higher 5 years return at 15.5% a year, and EMKT offers the higher at 13.49%.

Lower fee

EMKT 0.69% p.a.

Higher 5 years return

EMKT 15.5% p.a.

Higher yield

EMKT 13.49%

Lower volatility

B1SM 13.3% (5y)

Larger fund

EMKT $731m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	EMKT VanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF	B1SM Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider	VanEck	—
Tracks index	MSCI Emerging Markets Diversified Multiple-Factor Index	—
Categories	EM, Factor	EM, Market-Cap, Small-Cap, Active
Listed since	2018 (8 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	$731m	$428m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.69%	1.34%
Dividend yield	13.49%	6.97%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	30%	—
Tax drag	5.04%	2.23%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	35.6% net	-11.2% net
3-year return	24.3% net	-1% net
5-year return	15.5% net	-1.2% net
10-year return	—	3.8% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	16.8%	12.8%
Volatility (5y)	15.2%	13.3%
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	1.15	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.82	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

EMKT VanEck MSCI Multifactor Emerging Markets Equity ETF

Top-6% returns over 5 years (12th of 188 ETFs we track).
High 13.49% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.39%.

Full EMKT analysis →

B1SM Bell Global Emerging Companies Class A Active ETF

High 6.97% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

Has lagged most peers over 3 years (223rd of 226).

Full B1SM analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between EMKT vs B1SM?

EMKT and B1SM are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. EMKT carries the lower management fee (0.69%). Over 5 years, EMKT has delivered the higher total return (15.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - EMKT vs B1SM?

EMKT has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, versus B1SM 1.34%.

Which has performed higher - EMKT vs B1SM?

Over the past 5 years, EMKT has delivered the higher total return at 15.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

EMKT pays the higher at 13.49%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

EMKT is the larger fund by assets ($731m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

EMKT vs VGE EMKT vs AVTE EMKT vs IZZ EMKT vs NDIA EMKT vs IEM EMKT vs BEMG B1SM vs VGE B1SM vs IEM

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.