At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
CLDD
BetaShares Cloud Computing ETF
|
WWWW
ETFS US Technology ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
BetaShares
|
—
|
| Tracks index |
Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index
|
—
|
| Categories |
Intl, Thematic, Tech
|
Intl, Thematic, Tech, US
|
| Listed since |
—
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$43m
|
$24m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.67%
|
0.17%
|
| Dividend yield |
0%
|
0.64%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
—
|
—
|
| Tax drag | 0% | 0.2% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
1.6%
net
|
15.3%
net
|
| 3-year return |
4.3%
net
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
-1.2%
net
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
26%
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
24.4%
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.13
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
CLDD and WWWW are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. WWWW carries the lower management fee (0.17%). Over 1 year, WWWW has delivered the higher total return (15.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
WWWW has the lower management fee at 0.17% a year, versus CLDD 0.67%.
Over the past 1 year, WWWW has delivered the higher total return at 15.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
WWWW pays the higher at 0.64%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
CLDD is the larger fund by assets ($43m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.