BSUB vs MQSD - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing BSUB and MQSD. BSUB has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, MQSD has the higher 1 year return at 6.2% a year, and MQSD offers the higher at 5.33%.

Lower fee

BSUB 0.29% p.a.

Higher 1 year return

MQSD 6.2% p.a.

Higher yield

MQSD 5.33%

Larger fund

MQSD $958m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	BSUB BetaShares Australian Major Bank Subordinated Debt ETF	MQSD Macquarie Subordinated Debt Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider	BetaShares	—
Tracks index	Solactive Australian Major Bank Subordinated Debt Select Index	—
Categories	AU	Bonds, AU, Active
Listed since	2022 (4 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	$772m	$958m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.29%	0.29%
Dividend yield	4.69%	5.33%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	15%	30%
Tax drag	1.86%	2.43%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	5.6% net	6.2% net
3-year return	—	—
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	—
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

BSUB BetaShares Australian Major Bank Subordinated Debt ETF

Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 4.69% income yield.

Cheaper alternatives exist: OZBD and VACF.

Full BSUB analysis →

MQSD Macquarie Subordinated Debt Active ETF

Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 5.33% income yield.

Full MQSD analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between BSUB vs MQSD?

BSUB and MQSD are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. BSUB carries the lower management fee (0.29%). Over 1 year, MQSD has delivered the higher total return (6.2% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - BSUB vs MQSD?

BSUB has the lower management fee at 0.29% a year, versus MQSD 0.29%.

Which has performed higher - BSUB vs MQSD?

Over the past 1 year, MQSD has delivered the higher total return at 6.2% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MQSD pays the higher at 5.33%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MQSD is the larger fund by assets ($958m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

BSUB vs MXT BSUB vs PCI BSUB vs VACF BSUB vs OZBD BSUB vs SUBD BSUB vs BHYB BSUB vs FSUB MQSD vs SUBD

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.