BILL vs MMKT - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing BILL and MMKT. BILL has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year and BILL offers the higher at 3.96%.

Lower fee

BILL 0.07% p.a.

Higher yield

BILL 3.96%

Larger fund

BILL $1.2bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	BILL iShares Core Cash ETF	MMKT BetaShares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider	iShares	BetaShares
Tracks index	—	—
Categories	AU, Bonds	AU, Bonds, Active
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$1.2bn	$596m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.07%	0.18%
Dividend yield	3.96%	—
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	0%	0%
Tax drag	1.27%	0%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	4% net	—
3-year return	4.3% net	—
5-year return	3.3% net	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	0.1%	—
Volatility (5y)	0.5%	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	1.98	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

BILL iShares Core Cash ETF

Low-cost: a 0.07% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 3.96% income yield.

Has lagged most peers over 3 years (186th of 226).

Full BILL analysis →

MMKT BetaShares Australian Cash Plus Active ETF

Low-cost: a 0.18% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Cheaper alternatives exist: BILL, ISEC, and MONY.

Full MMKT analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between BILL vs MMKT?

BILL and MMKT are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. BILL carries the lower management fee (0.07%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - BILL vs MMKT?

BILL has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year, versus MMKT 0.18%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

BILL pays the higher at 3.96%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

BILL is the larger fund by assets ($1.2bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

BILL vs AAA BILL vs ISEC BILL vs MONY BILL vs FSCF MMKT vs AAA MMKT vs ISEC MMKT vs MONY MMKT vs FSCF

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.