Grow it · ETFs

BGBL vs NNWH

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing BGBL and NNWH. BGBL has the lower management fee at 0.08% a year, NNWH has the higher 3 years return at 25.7% a year, and NNWH offers the higher at 16.81%.
Lower fee
BGBL 0.08% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
NNWH 25.7% p.a.
Higher yield
NNWH 16.81%
Higher risk-adjusted
BGBL Sharpe 1.47 (3y)
Lower volatility
BGBL 9.4% (3y)
Larger fund
BGBL $5.5bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric BGBL
BetaShares Global Shares ETF
NNWH
Nanuk New World Fund (Currency Hedged) Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
—
Tracks index
Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
—
Categories
Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Intl, Active
Listed since
2021 (5 yrs)
—
Fund size (AUM)
$5.5bn
$151m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.08%
1.1%
Dividend yield
1.14%
16.81%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
5%
—
Tax drag 0.48% 5.38%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
10.2%
net
30.5%
net
3-year return
18.9%
net
25.7%
net
5-year return
—
—
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
9.4%
16.3%
Volatility (5y)
—
—
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
1.47
1.24
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

BGBL BetaShares Global Shares ETF
  • Top-20% returns over 3 years (47th of 236 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.08% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
NNWH Nanuk New World Fund (Currency Hedged) Active ETF
  • Top-6% returns over 1 year (20th of 318 ETFs we track).
  • High 16.81% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • A 1.1% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between BGBL vs NNWH?

BGBL and NNWH are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. BGBL carries the lower management fee (0.08%). Over 3 years, NNWH has delivered the higher total return (25.7% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - BGBL vs NNWH?

BGBL has the lower management fee at 0.08% a year, versus NNWH 1.1%.

Which has performed higher - BGBL vs NNWH?

Over the past 3 years, NNWH has delivered the higher total return at 25.7% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

NNWH pays the higher at 16.81%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

BGBL is the larger fund by assets ($5.5bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?