Grow it · ETFs

ATOM vs URNM

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing ATOM and URNM. ATOM has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, ATOM has the higher 3 years return at 23% a year, and ATOM offers the higher at 9.48%.
Lower fee
ATOM 0.69% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
ATOM 23% p.a.
Higher yield
ATOM 9.48%
Higher risk-adjusted
ATOM Sharpe 0.61 (3y)
Lower volatility
ATOM 39.4% (3y)
Larger fund
URNM $302m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric ATOM
Global X Uranium ETF
URNM
BetaShares Global Uranium ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
BetaShares
Tracks index
Solactive Global Uranium Pure-Play Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic
Intl, Thematic, Commodities
Listed since
2022 (4 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$117m
$302m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.69%
0.69%
Dividend yield
9.48%
2.61%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
30%
Tax drag 3.03% 1.56%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-5.1%
net
11.3%
net
3-year return
23%
net
18%
net
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
39.4%
40.1%
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.61
0.5
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

ATOM Global X Uranium ETF
  • Top-8% returns over 3 years (18th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • High 9.48% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (279th of 308).
URNM BetaShares Global Uranium ETF
  • Top-15% returns over 3 years (35th of 226 ETFs we track).
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between ATOM vs URNM?

ATOM and URNM are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. ATOM carries the lower management fee (0.69%). Over 3 years, ATOM has delivered the higher total return (23% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - ATOM vs URNM?

ATOM has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, versus URNM 0.69%.

Which has performed higher - ATOM vs URNM?

Over the past 3 years, ATOM has delivered the higher total return at 23% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

ATOM pays the higher at 9.48%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

URNM is the larger fund by assets ($302m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?