AGX1 vs IISV - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing AGX1 and IISV. IISV has the lower management fee at 0.97% a year.

Lower fee

IISV 0.97% p.a.

Larger fund

AGX1 $395m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	AGX1 Antipodes Global Value Active ETF	IISV Intelligent Investor Select Value Share Fund - Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	—
Tracks index	—	—
Categories	Intl, Value, Factor, Active	Intl, Value, Factor, Active
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$395m	$66m
Cost & income
Management fee	1.1%	0.97%
Dividend yield	—	—
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	—	—
Tax drag	—	—
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	—	—
3-year return	—	—
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	—
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

AGX1 Antipodes Global Value Active ETF

A 1.1% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full AGX1 analysis →

IISV Intelligent Investor Select Value Share Fund - Active ETF

A 0.97% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full IISV analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between AGX1 vs IISV?

AGX1 and IISV are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. IISV carries the lower management fee (0.97%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - AGX1 vs IISV?

IISV has the lower management fee at 0.97% a year, versus AGX1 1.1%.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

AGX1 is the larger fund by assets ($395m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

AGX1 vs VVLU AGX1 vs VLUE AGX1 vs CIVH AGX1 vs CUIV AGX1 vs MIDS IISV vs VVLU IISV vs VLUE

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.