AGX1 vs CIVH - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing AGX1 and CIVH. CIVH has the lower management fee at 1.03% a year and CIVH offers the higher at 19.49%.

Lower fee

CIVH 1.03% p.a.

Higher yield

CIVH 19.49%

Larger fund

CIVH $1.2bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	AGX1 Antipodes Global Value Active ETF	CIVH ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Value (Hedged) Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	—
Tracks index	—	—
Categories	Intl, Value, Factor, Active	Intl, Value, Factor, Active
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$395m	$1.2bn
Cost & income
Management fee	1.1%	1.03%
Dividend yield	—	19.49%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	—	—
Tax drag	—	6.24%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	—	5.1% net
3-year return	—	11% net
5-year return	—	3.8% net
10-year return	—	1.3% net
Risk
Volatility (3y)	—	11.6%
Volatility (5y)	—	13.1%
Volatility (10y)	—	13%
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	0.61
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	0.1
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

AGX1 Antipodes Global Value Active ETF

A 1.1% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full AGX1 analysis →

CIVH ClearBridge Global Infrastructure Value (Hedged) Active ETF

High 19.49% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

Has lagged most peers over 10 years (100th of 110).

Full CIVH analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between AGX1 vs CIVH?

AGX1 and CIVH are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. CIVH carries the lower management fee (1.03%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - AGX1 vs CIVH?

CIVH has the lower management fee at 1.03% a year, versus AGX1 1.1%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

CIVH pays the higher at 19.49%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

CIVH is the larger fund by assets ($1.2bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

AGX1 vs VVLU AGX1 vs VLUE AGX1 vs CUIV AGX1 vs IISV AGX1 vs MIDS CIVH vs VVLU CIVH vs VLUE

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.