Grow it · ETFs

ACDC vs XMET

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing ACDC and XMET. ACDC has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, XMET has the higher 3 years return at 18.1% a year, and ACDC offers the higher at 13.29%.
Lower fee
ACDC 0.69% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
XMET 18.1% p.a.
Higher yield
ACDC 13.29%
Higher risk-adjusted
XMET Sharpe 0.58 (3y)
Lower volatility
ACDC 23.9% (3y)
Larger fund
ACDC $607m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric ACDC
Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF
XMET
BetaShares Energy Transition Metals ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
BetaShares
Tracks index
Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic
Intl, Thematic
Listed since
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$607m
$115m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.69%
0.69%
Dividend yield
13.29%
4.06%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
35%
Tax drag 5.09% 1.3%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
40.6%
net
53%
net
3-year return
13.8%
net
18.1%
net
5-year return
11.1%
net
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
23.9%
28.5%
Volatility (5y)
21.3%
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.49
0.58
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.45
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

ACDC Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF
  • Top-6% returns over 1 year (19th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • High 13.29% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.
XMET BetaShares Energy Transition Metals ETF
  • Top-3% returns over 1 year (10th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • Pays a useful 4.06% income yield.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between ACDC vs XMET?

ACDC and XMET are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. ACDC carries the lower management fee (0.69%). Over 3 years, XMET has delivered the higher total return (18.1% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - ACDC vs XMET?

ACDC has the lower management fee at 0.69% a year, versus XMET 0.69%.

Which has performed higher - ACDC vs XMET?

Over the past 3 years, XMET has delivered the higher total return at 18.1% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

ACDC pays the higher at 13.29%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

ACDC is the larger fund by assets ($607m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?