At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
ZYUS
Global X S&P 500 High Yield Low Volatility ETF
|
WDIV
State Street SPDR S&P Global Dividend ETF
|
INCM
BetaShares S&P Global High Dividend Aristocrats ETF
|
CFLO
BetaShares Global Cash Flow Kings ETF
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||||
| Provider |
Global X
|
State Street
|
BetaShares
|
BetaShares
|
| Tracks index |
—
|
S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index
|
S&P Global Dividend Aristocrats Index
|
—
|
| Categories |
Intl, Thematic, Dividend, US
|
Intl, Dividend
|
Intl, Thematic, Dividend
|
Intl, Thematic
|
| Listed since |
—
|
2013 (13 yrs)
|
—
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$69m
|
$414m
|
$106m
|
$26m
|
| Cost & income | ||||
| Management fee |
0.35%
|
0.35%
|
0.39%
|
0.4%
|
| Dividend yield |
3.39%
|
10.43%
|
5.06%
|
3.03%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
—
|
35%
|
—
|
—
|
| Tax drag | 1.08% | 4.18% | 1.62% | 0.97% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|||
| 1-year return |
-3.4%
net
|
11.3%
net
|
9.9%
net
|
15.1%
net
|
| 3-year return |
8.1%
net
|
16.1%
net
|
16.1%
net
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
6.8%
net
|
9.8%
net
|
12.2%
net
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
6.7%
net
|
8%
net
|
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility (3y) |
11.5%
|
7.2%
|
8.7%
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
12%
|
8%
|
10.8%
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
12.8%
|
10.7%
|
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.38
|
1.56
|
1.3
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.32
|
0.8
|
0.82
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
0.4
|
0.57
|
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Has lagged most peers over 1 year (264th of 318).
- Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- High 10.43% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: VGS, SYI, and IHD.
- Top-17% returns over 5 years (33rd of 189 ETFs we track).
- Low-cost: a 0.39% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: SYI, VHY, and WDIV.
- Top-19% returns over 1 year (62nd of 318 ETFs we track).
- Low-cost: a 0.4% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: WDIV, ZYUS, and INCM.
Frequently Asked Questions
ZYUS, WDIV, INCM, and CFLO are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. ZYUS carries the lowest management fee (0.35%). Over 10 years, WDIV has delivered the highest total return (8% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
ZYUS has the lowest management fee at 0.35% a year, versus WDIV 0.35%, INCM 0.39%, and CFLO 0.4%.
Over the past 10 years, WDIV has delivered the highest total return at 8% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
WDIV pays the highest at 10.43%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
WDIV is the largest fund by assets ($414m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.