Grow it · ETFs

XX20 vs DACE

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing XX20 and DACE. DACE has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year and XX20 offers the higher at 1.44%.
Lower fee
DACE 0.28% p.a.
Higher yield
XX20 1.44%
Larger fund
XX20 $225m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric XX20
First Sentier ex-20 Australian Share Fund Active ETF
DACE
Dimensional Australian Core Equity Trust - Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
—
—
Tracks index
—
S&P/ASX 300 Index
Categories
AU, Active
AU, Factor, Value, Small-Cap
Listed since
—
2006 (20 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$225m
—
Cost & income
Management fee
0.75%
0.28%
Dividend yield
1.44%
—
Franking
55%
80%
Turnover
38%
20%
Tax drag 1.14% 0.48%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-27.9%
net
—
3-year return
1.2%
net
—
5-year return
-3.8%
net
—
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
20.1%
—
Volatility (5y)
21.8%
—
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

XX20 First Sentier ex-20 Australian Share Fund Active ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 5 years (187th of 189).
DACE Dimensional Australian Core Equity Trust - Active ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.28% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: MQAE, A200, and IOZ.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between XX20 vs DACE?

XX20 and DACE are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. DACE carries the lower management fee (0.28%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - XX20 vs DACE?

DACE has the lower management fee at 0.28% a year, versus XX20 0.75%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

XX20 pays the higher at 1.44%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

XX20 is the larger fund by assets ($225m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?