At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
XMET
BetaShares Energy Transition Metals ETF
|
VOLT
ETFS Global Lithium Miners ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
BetaShares
|
—
|
| Tracks index |
—
|
—
|
| Categories |
Intl, Thematic
|
Intl, Thematic
|
| Listed since |
—
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$115m
|
$0m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.69%
|
0.49%
|
| Dividend yield |
4.06%
|
—
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
—
|
—
|
| Tax drag | 1.3% | — |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
53%
net
|
—
|
| 3-year return |
18.1%
net
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
—
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
—
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
28.5%
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.58
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
—
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
—
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
Frequently Asked Questions
XMET and VOLT are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. VOLT carries the lower management fee (0.49%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
VOLT has the lower management fee at 0.49% a year, versus XMET 0.69%.
XMET pays the higher at 4.06%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
XMET is the larger fund by assets ($115m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.