WXOZ vs BGBL - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing WXOZ and BGBL. WXOZ has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year, BGBL has the higher 3 years return at 18.9% a year, and WXOZ offers the higher at 5.88%.

Lower fee

WXOZ 0.07% p.a.

Higher 3 years return

BGBL 18.9% p.a.

Higher yield

WXOZ 5.88%

Higher risk-adjusted

BGBL Sharpe 1.47 (3y)

Lower volatility

WXOZ 9.2% (3y)

Larger fund

BGBL $5.5bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	WXOZ State Street SPDR S&P World ex Australia Carbon Aware ETF	BGBL BetaShares Global Shares ETF
Snapshot
Provider	State Street	BetaShares
Tracks index	—	Solactive GBS Developed Markets Large & Mid Cap Index
Categories	Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap, ESG	Intl, Large-Cap, Market-Cap
Listed since	—	2021 (5 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$854m	$5.5bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.07%	0.08%
Dividend yield	5.88%	1.14%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	—	5%
Tax drag	1.88%	0.48%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	7.5% net	10.2% net
3-year return	17.7% net	18.9% net
5-year return	11.8% net	—
10-year return	13.4% net	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	9.2%	9.4%
Volatility (5y)	10.8%	—
Volatility (10y)	10.7%	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	1.39	1.47
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.78	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	1.02	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

WXOZ State Street SPDR S&P World ex Australia Carbon Aware ETF

Top-18% returns over 10 years (20th of 110 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.07% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

That income is taxed yearly at your marginal rate, so it's less efficient for higher earners.

Full WXOZ analysis →

BGBL BetaShares Global Shares ETF

Top-20% returns over 3 years (47th of 236 ETFs we track).
Low-cost: a 0.08% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.

Full BGBL analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between WXOZ vs BGBL?

WXOZ and BGBL are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. WXOZ carries the lower management fee (0.07%). Over 3 years, BGBL has delivered the higher total return (18.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - WXOZ vs BGBL?

WXOZ has the lower management fee at 0.07% a year, versus BGBL 0.08%.

Which has performed higher - WXOZ vs BGBL?

Over the past 3 years, BGBL has delivered the higher total return at 18.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

WXOZ pays the higher at 5.88%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

BGBL is the larger fund by assets ($5.5bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

WXOZ vs VGS WXOZ vs IWLD BGBL vs VGS BGBL vs IWLD BGBL vs HGBL BGBL vs VGAD BGBL vs IHWL BGBL vs DGCE

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.