WIRE vs GMTL - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing WIRE and GMTL. WIRE has the lower management fee at 0.65% a year, WIRE has the higher 3 years return at 31.3% a year, and GMTL offers the higher at 9.46%.

Lower fee

WIRE 0.65% p.a.

Higher 3 years return

WIRE 31.3% p.a.

Higher yield

GMTL 9.46%

Higher risk-adjusted

WIRE Sharpe 0.95 (3y)

Lower volatility

GMTL 26.4% (3y)

Larger fund

WIRE $909m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	WIRE Global X Copper Miners ETF	GMTL Global X Green Metal Miners ETF
Snapshot
Provider	Global X	Global X
Tracks index	Solactive Global Copper Miners Index	—
Categories	Intl, Thematic, Commodities	Intl, Thematic
Listed since	2021 (5 yrs)	—
Fund size (AUM)	$909m	$12m
Cost & income
Management fee	0.65%	0.69%
Dividend yield	3.01%	9.46%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	20%	—
Tax drag	1.44%	3.03%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	38.4% net	17% net
3-year return	31.3% net	16.5% net
5-year return	—	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	28.9%	26.4%
Volatility (5y)	—	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.95	0.55
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

WIRE Global X Copper Miners ETF

Top-4% returns over 3 years (10th of 236 ETFs we track).

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Full WIRE analysis →

GMTL Global X Green Metal Miners ETF

Top-16% returns over 1 year (51st of 318 ETFs we track).
High 9.46% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.

Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Full GMTL analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between WIRE vs GMTL?

WIRE and GMTL are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. WIRE carries the lower management fee (0.65%). Over 3 years, WIRE has delivered the higher total return (31.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - WIRE vs GMTL?

WIRE has the lower management fee at 0.65% a year, versus GMTL 0.69%.

Which has performed higher - WIRE vs GMTL?

Over the past 3 years, WIRE has delivered the higher total return at 31.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

GMTL pays the higher at 9.46%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

WIRE is the larger fund by assets ($909m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

WIRE vs QRE WIRE vs ACDC WIRE vs URNM WIRE vs FUEL WIRE vs ETPMAG WIRE vs CPPR GMTL vs XMET GMTL vs ACDC

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.