VBLD vs MICH - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing VBLD and MICH. VBLD has the lower management fee at 0.46% a year and VBLD offers the higher at 2.33%.

Lower fee

VBLD 0.46% p.a.

Higher yield

VBLD 2.33%

Larger fund

VBLD $648m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	VBLD Vanguard Global Infrastructure Index ETF	MICH Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Currency Hedged)
Snapshot
Provider	Vanguard	—
Tracks index	FTSE Developed Core Infrastructure Index	S&P Global Infrastructure Index (AUD Hedged)
Categories	Intl, Thematic	Intl, Thematic, Active
Listed since	—	2016 (10 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)	$648m	—
Cost & income
Management fee	0.46%	1.05%
Dividend yield	2.33%	—
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	—	20%
Tax drag	0.75%	0.48%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	-1.6% net	—
3-year return	9.6% net	—
5-year return	6.5% net	—
10-year return	—	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	10.8%	—
Volatility (5y)	10.9%	—
Volatility (10y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	0.52	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	0.32	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

VBLD Vanguard Global Infrastructure Index ETF

Has lagged most peers over 1 year (246th of 318).

Full VBLD analysis →

MICH Magellan Infrastructure Fund (Currency Hedged)

A 1.05% management fee is high and compounds against you over time.

Full MICH analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between VBLD vs MICH?

VBLD and MICH are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. VBLD carries the lower management fee (0.46%). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - VBLD vs MICH?

VBLD has the lower management fee at 0.46% a year, versus MICH 1.05%.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

VBLD pays the higher at 2.33%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

VBLD is the larger fund by assets ($648m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

VBLD vs IFRA VBLD vs GLIN VBLD vs PAVE VBLD vs GHIF VBLD vs TOLL MICH vs IFRA MICH vs GLIN MICH vs CIIH

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.