Grow it · ETFs

SEMI vs ACDC

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing SEMI and ACDC. SEMI has the lower management fee at 0.45% a year, SEMI has the higher 3 years return at 50.5% a year, and ACDC offers the higher at 13.29%.
Lower fee
SEMI 0.45% p.a.
Higher 3 years return
SEMI 50.5% p.a.
Higher yield
ACDC 13.29%
Higher risk-adjusted
SEMI Sharpe 1.22 (3y)
Lower volatility
ACDC 23.9% (3y)
Larger fund
SEMI $935m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric SEMI
Global X Semiconductor ETF
ACDC
Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF
Snapshot
Provider
Global X
Global X
Tracks index
Solactive Semiconductor 30 Index
Solactive Battery Value-Chain Index
Categories
Intl, Thematic, Tech
Intl, Thematic
Listed since
2021 (5 yrs)
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$935m
$607m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.45%
0.69%
Dividend yield
8.32%
13.29%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
15%
35%
Tax drag 3.02% 5.09%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
106.2%
net
40.6%
net
3-year return
50.5%
net
13.8%
net
5-year return
11.1%
net
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
35.4%
23.9%
Volatility (5y)
21.3%
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
1.22
0.49
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.45
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

SEMI Global X Semiconductor ETF
  • Top-0% returns over 3 years (1st of 226 ETFs we track).
  • High 8.32% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: FANG.
ACDC Global X Battery Tech & Lithium ETF
  • Top-6% returns over 1 year (19th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • High 13.29% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.46%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between SEMI vs ACDC?

SEMI and ACDC are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. SEMI carries the lower management fee (0.45%). Over 3 years, SEMI has delivered the higher total return (50.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - SEMI vs ACDC?

SEMI has the lower management fee at 0.45% a year, versus ACDC 0.69%.

Which has performed higher - SEMI vs ACDC?

Over the past 3 years, SEMI has delivered the higher total return at 50.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

ACDC pays the higher at 13.29%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

SEMI is the larger fund by assets ($935m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?