RSM vs AGVT - Compare ETFs side by side

At a glance

Comparing RSM and AGVT. AGVT has the lower management fee at 0.22% a year, RSM has the higher 5 years return at 0.5% a year, and AGVT offers the higher at 4%.

Lower fee

AGVT 0.22% p.a.

Higher 5 years return

RSM 0.5% p.a.

Higher yield

AGVT 4%

Lower volatility

RSM 4.6% (5y)

Larger fund

AGVT $1.1bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric	RSM Russell Investments Australian Semi-Government Bond ETF	AGVT BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF
Snapshot
Provider	—	BetaShares
Tracks index	—	Solactive Australian Government 7-12 Year AUD TR Index
Categories	Bonds, AU	Bonds, AU
Listed since	—	—
Fund size (AUM)	$62m	$1.1bn
Cost & income
Management fee	0.26%	0.22%
Dividend yield	3.95%	4%
Franking	0%	0%
Turnover	20%	30%
Tax drag	1.74%	2%
Returns	Tax bracket - adjusts tax drag & net returns
1-year return	0.6% net	0.3% net
3-year return	3.6% net	3.4% net
5-year return	0.5% net	-1.6% net
10-year return	1.7% net	—
Risk
Volatility (3y)	3.5%	6.4%
Volatility (5y)	4.6%	8.2%
Volatility (10y)	3.5%	—
Sharpe ratio (3y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (5y)	—	—
Sharpe ratio (10y)	—	—
Bid/ask spread	—	—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

RSM Russell Investments Australian Semi-Government Bond ETF

Low-cost: a 0.26% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 3.95% income yield.

Has lagged most peers over 10 years (96th of 108).

Full RSM analysis →

AGVT BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF

Low-cost: a 0.22% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
Pays a useful 4% income yield.

Has lagged most peers over 5 years (179th of 188).

Full AGVT analysis →

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between RSM vs AGVT?

RSM and AGVT are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. AGVT carries the lower management fee (0.22%). Over 5 years, RSM has delivered the higher total return (0.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - RSM vs AGVT?

AGVT has the lower management fee at 0.22% a year, versus RSM 0.26%.

Which has performed higher - RSM vs AGVT?

Over the past 5 years, RSM has delivered the higher total return at 0.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

AGVT pays the higher at 4%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

AGVT is the larger fund by assets ($1.1bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

RSM vs VGB RSM vs VAF RSM vs IGB AGVT vs VGB AGVT vs VAF AGVT vs IGB AGVT vs 1GOV AGVT vs 5GOV

← Back to all ETFs

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.