Grow it · ETFs

RSM vs AGVT

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing RSM and AGVT. AGVT has the lower management fee at 0.22% a year, RSM has the higher 5 years return at 0.4% a year, and AGVT offers the higher at 4.32%.
Lower fee
AGVT 0.22% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
RSM 0.4% p.a.
Higher yield
AGVT 4.32%
Lower volatility
RSM 4.6% (5y)
Larger fund
AGVT $1.1bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric RSM
Russell Investments Australian Semi-Government Bond ETF
AGVT
BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF
Snapshot
Provider
—
BetaShares
Tracks index
—
Solactive Australian Government 7-12 Year AUD TR Index
Categories
Bonds, AU
Bonds, AU
Listed since
—
—
Fund size (AUM)
$50m
$1.1bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.26%
0.22%
Dividend yield
3.37%
4.32%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
20%
30%
Tax drag 1.56% 2.1%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-0.6%
net
-2.2%
net
3-year return
3.3%
net
3.3%
net
5-year return
0.4%
net
-1.6%
net
10-year return
1.6%
net
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
3.5%
6.2%
Volatility (5y)
4.6%
8.2%
Volatility (10y)
3.5%
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

RSM Russell Investments Australian Semi-Government Bond ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.26% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Low volatility (3.49% over 10 years) for a smoother ride.
  • Has lagged most peers over 3 years (211th of 236).
AGVT BetaShares Australian Government Bond ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.22% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pays a useful 4.32% income yield.
  • Has lagged most peers over 5 years (179th of 189).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between RSM vs AGVT?

RSM and AGVT are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. AGVT carries the lower management fee (0.22%). Over 5 years, RSM has delivered the higher total return (0.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - RSM vs AGVT?

AGVT has the lower management fee at 0.22% a year, versus RSM 0.26%.

Which has performed higher - RSM vs AGVT?

Over the past 5 years, RSM has delivered the higher total return at 0.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

AGVT pays the higher at 4.32%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

AGVT is the larger fund by assets ($1.1bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?