Grow it · ETFs

RMBS vs OZBD

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing RMBS and OZBD. OZBD has the lower management fee at 0.19% a year, RMBS has the higher 1 year return at 4.5% a year, and RMBS offers the higher at 4.86%.
Lower fee
OZBD 0.19% p.a.
Higher 1 year return
RMBS 4.5% p.a.
Higher yield
RMBS 4.86%
Larger fund
OZBD $1.4bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric RMBS
VanEck Australian RMBS ETF
OZBD
BetaShares Australian Composite Bond ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
BetaShares
Tracks index
Solactive Australian Composite Bond Select Index
Categories
Bonds, AU
AU, Bonds
Listed since
2022 (4 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$32m
$1.4bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.29%
0.19%
Dividend yield
4.86%
4.23%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
25%
25%
Tax drag 2.16% 1.95%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
4.5%
net
1.1%
net
3-year return
4.3%
net
5-year return
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
4.8%
Volatility (5y)
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.14
Sharpe ratio (5y)
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

RMBS VanEck Australian RMBS ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pays a useful 4.86% income yield.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: IAF, VAF, and OZBD.
OZBD BetaShares Australian Composite Bond ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.19% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pays a useful 4.23% income yield.
  • Has lagged most peers over 3 years (185th of 226).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between RMBS vs OZBD?

RMBS and OZBD are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. OZBD carries the lower management fee (0.19%). Over 1 year, RMBS has delivered the higher total return (4.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - RMBS vs OZBD?

OZBD has the lower management fee at 0.19% a year, versus RMBS 0.29%.

Which has performed higher - RMBS vs OZBD?

Over the past 1 year, RMBS has delivered the higher total return at 4.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

RMBS pays the higher at 4.86%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

OZBD is the larger fund by assets ($1.4bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?