Grow it · ETFs

QOZ vs MVW

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing QOZ and MVW. MVW has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, QOZ has the higher 10 years return at 10.6% a year, and QOZ offers the higher at 3.8%.
Lower fee
MVW 0.35% p.a.
Higher 10 years return
QOZ 10.6% p.a.
Higher yield
QOZ 3.8%
Higher risk-adjusted
QOZ Sharpe 0.65 (10y)
Lower volatility
QOZ 13.7% (10y)
Larger fund
MVW $3.3bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric QOZ
BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF
MVW
VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
VanEck
Tracks index
FTSE RAFI Australia 200 Index
MVIS Australia Equal Weight Index
Categories
AU, Factor, Value
AU, Factor
Listed since
2013 (13 yrs)
2014 (12 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$1.3bn
$3.3bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.4%
0.35%
Dividend yield
3.8%
3.4%
Franking
78%
75%
Turnover
18%
20%
Tax drag 0.78% 0.82%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
18.6%
net
1.6%
net
3-year return
14.3%
net
7.5%
net
5-year return
11.4%
net
7.4%
net
10-year return
10.6%
net
8.3%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
10.5%
10%
Volatility (5y)
12.2%
12.2%
Volatility (10y)
13.7%
14.1%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.94
0.36
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.68
0.38
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.65
0.48
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

QOZ BetaShares FTSE RAFI Australia 200 ETF
  • Top-19% returns over 1 year (58th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • Low-cost: a 0.4% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.34%.
MVW VanEck Australian Equal Weight ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.34%.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between QOZ vs MVW?

QOZ and MVW are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MVW carries the lower management fee (0.35%). Over 10 years, QOZ has delivered the higher total return (10.6% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - QOZ vs MVW?

MVW has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus QOZ 0.4%.

Which has performed higher - QOZ vs MVW?

Over the past 10 years, QOZ has delivered the higher total return at 10.6% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

QOZ pays the higher at 3.8%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

MVW is the larger fund by assets ($3.3bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?