Grow it · ETFs

QHAL vs QLTY

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing QHAL and QLTY. QLTY has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, QHAL has the higher 5 years return at 9.3% a year, and QHAL offers the higher at 3.44%.
Lower fee
QLTY 0.35% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
QHAL 9.3% p.a.
Higher yield
QHAL 3.44%
Higher risk-adjusted
QLTY Sharpe 0.48 (5y)
Lower volatility
QLTY 13% (5y)
Larger fund
QHAL $2.5bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric QHAL
VanEck MSCI International Quality (AUD Hedged) ETF
QLTY
BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
BetaShares
Tracks index
MSCI World ex Australia Quality Index (AUD Hedged)
iSTOXX MUTB Global ex-Australia Quality Leaders 150 Index
Categories
Intl, Factor, Quality
Intl, Factor, Quality
Listed since
2019 (7 yrs)
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$2.5bn
$992m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.43%
0.35%
Dividend yield
3.44%
3.41%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
15%
20%
Tax drag 1.46% 1.57%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
18.8%
net
6.5%
net
3-year return
15.5%
net
13.3%
net
5-year return
9.3%
net
8.9%
net
10-year return
Risk
Volatility (3y)
12.3%
10.9%
Volatility (5y)
15.6%
13%
Volatility (10y)
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.91
0.84
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.45
0.48
Sharpe ratio (10y)
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

QHAL VanEck MSCI International Quality (AUD Hedged) ETF
  • Top-18% returns over 1 year (55th of 308 ETFs we track).
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: HGBL, VGAD, and QLTY.
QLTY BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: GARP.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between QHAL vs QLTY?

QHAL and QLTY are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. QLTY carries the lower management fee (0.35%). Over 5 years, QHAL has delivered the higher total return (9.3% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - QHAL vs QLTY?

QLTY has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus QHAL 0.43%.

Which has performed higher - QHAL vs QLTY?

Over the past 5 years, QHAL has delivered the higher total return at 9.3% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

QHAL pays the higher at 3.44%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

QHAL is the larger fund by assets ($2.5bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?