Grow it · ETFs

OZBD vs RMBS

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing OZBD and RMBS. OZBD has the lower management fee at 0.19% a year, RMBS has the higher 1 year return at 4.5% a year, and RMBS offers the higher at 4.88%.
Lower fee
OZBD 0.19% p.a.
Higher 1 year return
RMBS 4.5% p.a.
Higher yield
RMBS 4.88%
Larger fund
OZBD $1.4bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric OZBD
BetaShares Australian Composite Bond ETF
RMBS
VanEck Australian RMBS ETF
Snapshot
Provider
BetaShares
VanEck
Tracks index
Solactive Australian Composite Bond Select Index
—
Categories
AU, Bonds
Bonds, AU
Listed since
2022 (4 yrs)
—
Fund size (AUM)
$1.4bn
$36m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.19%
0.29%
Dividend yield
4.55%
4.88%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
25%
25%
Tax drag 2.06% 2.16%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-1.1%
net
4.5%
net
3-year return
4.1%
net
—
5-year return
—
—
10-year return
—
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
4.7%
—
Volatility (5y)
—
—
Volatility (10y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.14
—
Sharpe ratio (5y)
—
—
Sharpe ratio (10y)
—
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

OZBD BetaShares Australian Composite Bond ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.19% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pays a useful 4.55% income yield.
  • Has lagged most peers over 3 years (200th of 236).
RMBS VanEck Australian RMBS ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.29% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Pays a useful 4.88% income yield.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: IAF, VAF, and OZBD.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between OZBD vs RMBS?

OZBD and RMBS are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. OZBD carries the lower management fee (0.19%). Over 1 year, RMBS has delivered the higher total return (4.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - OZBD vs RMBS?

OZBD has the lower management fee at 0.19% a year, versus RMBS 0.29%.

Which has performed higher - OZBD vs RMBS?

Over the past 1 year, RMBS has delivered the higher total return at 4.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

RMBS pays the higher at 4.88%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

OZBD is the larger fund by assets ($1.4bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?