At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
NDQ
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 ETF
|
QNDQ
BetaShares NASDAQ 100 Equal Weight ETF
|
|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||
| Provider |
BetaShares
|
BetaShares
|
| Tracks index |
NASDAQ-100 Index
|
Nasdaq-100 Equal Weighted Index
|
| Categories |
US, Large-Cap, Tech, Growth, Market-Cap
|
Intl, Thematic, Tech, US, Factor
|
| Listed since |
2015 (11 yrs)
|
—
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$10.5bn
|
$21m
|
| Cost & income | ||
| Management fee |
0.48%
|
0.48%
|
| Dividend yield |
1.42%
|
2.62%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
15%
|
—
|
| Tax drag | 0.81% | 0.84% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|
| 1-year return |
17.5%
net
|
13%
net
|
| 3-year return |
24.4%
net
|
—
|
| 5-year return |
16.7%
net
|
—
|
| 10-year return |
21.6%
net
|
—
|
| Risk | ||
| Volatility (3y) |
16%
|
—
|
| Volatility (5y) |
18.1%
|
—
|
| Volatility (10y) |
16%
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
1.2
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.77
|
—
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
1.17
|
—
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Top-2% returns over 10 years (2nd of 110 ETFs we track).
- Strong risk-adjusted returns (10-year Sharpe ratio 1.17).
- Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.4%.
- Top-23% returns over 1 year (74th of 318 ETFs we track).
- Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.45%.
Frequently Asked Questions
NDQ and QNDQ are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. NDQ carries the lower management fee (0.48%). Over 1 year, NDQ has delivered the higher total return (17.5% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
NDQ has the lower management fee at 0.48% a year, versus QNDQ 0.48%.
Over the past 1 year, NDQ has delivered the higher total return at 17.5% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
QNDQ pays the higher at 2.62%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
NDQ is the larger fund by assets ($10.5bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.