Grow it · ETFs

MVS vs FSML

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing MVS and FSML. MVS has the lower management fee at 0.49% a year, FSML has the higher 5 years return at 6.9% a year, and FSML offers the higher at 5.89%.
Lower fee
MVS 0.49% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
FSML 6.9% p.a.
Higher yield
FSML 5.89%
Higher risk-adjusted
FSML Sharpe 0.28 (5y)
Lower volatility
FSML 16.9% (5y)
Larger fund
FSML $957m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric MVS
VanEck Small Companies Masters ETF
FSML
Firetrail Australian Small Companies Fund - Active ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
—
Tracks index
—
S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries Index
Categories
AU, Small-Cap
AU, Small-Cap
Listed since
—
2020 (6 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$185m
$957m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.49%
0.85%
Dividend yield
2.79%
5.89%
Franking
55%
60%
Turnover
25%
90%
Tax drag 1.05% 3.01%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
-2.9%
net
-1.3%
net
3-year return
10.2%
net
20.9%
net
5-year return
2.8%
net
6.9%
net
10-year return
5.4%
net
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
16.8%
15.3%
Volatility (5y)
17.5%
16.9%
Volatility (10y)
17.5%
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.42
1.06
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.1
0.28
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.26
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MVS VanEck Small Companies Masters ETF
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (260th of 318).
FSML Firetrail Australian Small Companies Fund - Active ETF
  • Top-16% returns over 3 years (37th of 236 ETFs we track).
  • High 5.89% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Has lagged most peers over 1 year (237th of 318).

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MVS vs FSML?

MVS and FSML are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. MVS carries the lower management fee (0.49%). Over 5 years, FSML has delivered the higher total return (6.9% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MVS vs FSML?

MVS has the lower management fee at 0.49% a year, versus FSML 0.85%.

Which has performed higher - MVS vs FSML?

Over the past 5 years, FSML has delivered the higher total return at 6.9% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

FSML pays the higher at 5.89%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

FSML is the larger fund by assets ($957m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?