Grow it · ETFs

MOAT vs QLTY

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing MOAT and QLTY. QLTY has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, MOAT has the higher 5 years return at 9.4% a year, and MOAT offers the higher at 9.91%.
Lower fee
QLTY 0.35% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
MOAT 9.4% p.a.
Higher yield
MOAT 9.91%
Higher risk-adjusted
MOAT Sharpe 0.52 (5y)
Lower volatility
MOAT 12.7% (5y)
Larger fund
QLTY $992m

Side-by-side comparison

Metric MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
QLTY
BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
BetaShares
Tracks index
Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index
iSTOXX MUTB Global ex-Australia Quality Leaders 150 Index
Categories
US, Factor, Quality, Value
Intl, Factor, Quality
Listed since
2015 (11 yrs)
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$877m
$992m
Cost & income
Management fee
0.49%
0.35%
Dividend yield
9.91%
3.41%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
40%
20%
Tax drag 4.13% 1.57%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
3.3%
net
6.5%
net
3-year return
8.5%
net
13.3%
net
5-year return
9.4%
net
8.9%
net
10-year return
14.3%
net
Risk
Volatility (3y)
12.1%
10.9%
Volatility (5y)
12.7%
13%
Volatility (10y)
12.9%
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.4
0.84
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.52
0.48
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.94
Bid/ask spread

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
  • Top-12% returns over 10 years (13th of 108 ETFs we track).
  • High 9.91% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.38%.
QLTY BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: GARP.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MOAT vs QLTY?

MOAT and QLTY are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. QLTY carries the lower management fee (0.35%). Over 5 years, MOAT has delivered the higher total return (9.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MOAT vs QLTY?

QLTY has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus MOAT 0.49%.

Which has performed higher - MOAT vs QLTY?

Over the past 5 years, MOAT has delivered the higher total return at 9.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MOAT pays the higher at 9.91%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

QLTY is the larger fund by assets ($992m). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?