Grow it · ETFs

MOAT vs QLTY

Compare fees, returns, income and risk for these 2 ASX-listed ETFs side by side.

At a glance

Comparing MOAT and QLTY. QLTY has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, QLTY has the higher 5 years return at 9.8% a year, and MOAT offers the higher at 10.04%.
Lower fee
QLTY 0.35% p.a.
Higher 5 years return
QLTY 9.8% p.a.
Higher yield
MOAT 10.04%
Higher risk-adjusted
QLTY Sharpe 0.54 (5y)
Lower volatility
QLTY 12.7% (5y)
Larger fund
QLTY $1.1bn

Side-by-side comparison

Metric MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
QLTY
BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
Snapshot
Provider
VanEck
BetaShares
Tracks index
Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index
iSTOXX MUTB Global ex-Australia Quality Leaders 150 Index
Categories
US, Factor, Quality, Value
Intl, Factor, Quality
Listed since
2015 (11 yrs)
2018 (8 yrs)
Fund size (AUM)
$843m
$1.1bn
Cost & income
Management fee
0.49%
0.35%
Dividend yield
10.04%
3.3%
Franking
0%
0%
Turnover
40%
20%
Tax drag 4.17% 1.54%
Returns
Tax bracket
1-year return
2.5%
net
7.9%
net
3-year return
9.9%
net
15.5%
net
5-year return
9.4%
net
9.8%
net
10-year return
14.3%
net
—
Risk
Volatility (3y)
12.2%
10.4%
Volatility (5y)
12.9%
12.7%
Volatility (10y)
12.9%
—
Sharpe ratio (3y)
0.5
1.05
Sharpe ratio (5y)
0.5
0.54
Sharpe ratio (10y)
0.93
—
Bid/ask spread
—
—

marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.

Each fund at a glance

MOAT VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
  • Top-14% returns over 10 years (15th of 110 ETFs we track).
  • High 10.04% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
  • Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.38%.
QLTY BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
  • Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
  • Cheaper alternatives exist: GARP.

Frequently Asked Questions

What's the difference between MOAT vs QLTY?

MOAT and QLTY are 2 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. QLTY carries the lower management fee (0.35%). Over 5 years, QLTY has delivered the higher total return (9.8% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.

Which has the lower fees - MOAT vs QLTY?

QLTY has the lower management fee at 0.35% a year, versus MOAT 0.49%.

Which has performed higher - MOAT vs QLTY?

Over the past 5 years, QLTY has delivered the higher total return at 9.8% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.

Which pays the higher dividend yield?

MOAT pays the higher at 10.04%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.

Which is the larger and most liquid?

QLTY is the larger fund by assets ($1.1bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.

Related comparisons

General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.

Please confirm?