At a glance
Side-by-side comparison
| Metric |
MOAT
VanEck Morningstar Wide Moat ETF
|
QHAL
VanEck MSCI International Quality (AUD Hedged) ETF
|
QLTY
BetaShares Global Quality Leaders ETF
|
QUAL
VanEck MSCI International Quality ETF
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Snapshot | ||||
| Provider |
VanEck
|
VanEck
|
BetaShares
|
VanEck
|
| Tracks index |
Morningstar Wide Moat Focus Index
|
MSCI World ex Australia Quality Index (AUD Hedged)
|
iSTOXX MUTB Global ex-Australia Quality Leaders 150 Index
|
MSCI World ex Australia Quality Index
|
| Categories |
US, Factor, Quality, Value
|
Intl, Factor, Quality
|
Intl, Factor, Quality
|
Intl, Factor, Quality
|
| Listed since |
2015 (11 yrs)
|
2019 (7 yrs)
|
2018 (8 yrs)
|
2014 (12 yrs)
|
| Fund size (AUM) |
$843m
|
$2.7bn
|
$1.1bn
|
$9.2bn
|
| Cost & income | ||||
| Management fee |
0.49%
|
0.43%
|
0.35%
|
0.4%
|
| Dividend yield |
10.04%
|
3.38%
|
3.3%
|
3.43%
|
| Franking |
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
0%
|
| Turnover |
40%
|
15%
|
20%
|
30%
|
| Tax drag | 4.17% | 1.44% | 1.54% | 1.82% |
| Returns |
Tax bracket
|
|||
| 1-year return |
2.5%
net
|
15.1%
net
|
7.9%
net
|
9.1%
net
|
| 3-year return |
9.9%
net
|
18.3%
net
|
15.5%
net
|
16.5%
net
|
| 5-year return |
9.4%
net
|
10.4%
net
|
9.8%
net
|
12.2%
net
|
| 10-year return |
14.3%
net
|
—
|
—
|
15.4%
net
|
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility (3y) |
12.2%
|
11.8%
|
10.4%
|
9.9%
|
| Volatility (5y) |
12.9%
|
15.2%
|
12.7%
|
12.2%
|
| Volatility (10y) |
12.9%
|
—
|
—
|
11.9%
|
| Sharpe ratio (3y) |
0.5
|
1.14
|
1.05
|
1.18
|
| Sharpe ratio (5y) |
0.5
|
0.51
|
0.54
|
0.73
|
| Sharpe ratio (10y) |
0.93
|
—
|
—
|
1.08
|
| Bid/ask spread |
—
|
—
|
—
|
—
|
marks the strongest fund in each row. “net” shows the after-tax return at your selected bracket. “—” means we don’t have that data point yet.
Each fund at a glance
- Top-14% returns over 10 years (15th of 110 ETFs we track).
- High 10.04% income yield — good for investors who want regular cash flow.
- Pricier than similar ETFs, which average around 0.38%.
- Top-20% returns over 1 year (63rd of 318 ETFs we track).
- Cheaper alternatives exist: HGBL, VGAD, and QLTY.
- Low-cost: a 0.35% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: GARP.
- Top-9% returns over 10 years (10th of 110 ETFs we track).
- Low-cost: a 0.4% management fee keeps more of the return in your pocket.
- Cheaper alternatives exist: IVV, GARP, and QLTY.
Frequently Asked Questions
MOAT, QHAL, QLTY, and QUAL are 4 Australian-listed ETFs we compare side by side. QLTY carries the lowest management fee (0.35%). Over 10 years, QUAL has delivered the highest total return (15.4% a year). The table above breaks down fees, returns, income and risk for each.
QLTY has the lowest management fee at 0.35% a year, versus MOAT 0.49%, QHAL 0.43%, and QUAL 0.4%.
Over the past 10 years, QUAL has delivered the highest total return at 15.4% a year. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns.
MOAT pays the highest at 10.04%. Remember distributions are taxed each year at your marginal rate.
QUAL is the largest fund by assets ($9.2bn). Larger funds are typically more liquid and trade on tighter spreads.
Related comparisons
General information only, generated from each fund's published data — not personal financial advice. Past performance is not a reliable indicator of future returns. Consider your own circumstances or seek licensed advice before investing.